Start the conversation


We’re trial lawyers. Our core competency – above everything else – is trying cases to juries. And we specialize in beating giants.

Minneapolis Brachial Plexus Injury Lawyer

The brachial plexus is a bundle of nerves between the neck and shoulder. It transmits signals controlling movement, feeling, and muscle function to the chest, shoulder, arm, and hand. During difficult births, these nerves can be stretched or torn, causing sometimes permanent neurological problems to babies, and risking the health of their mothers. Despite advances in medical treatment, these injuries are paradoxically getting more common with time, with up to 3 in every 1000 babies experiencing a brachial plexus injury (BPI).

BPI occurs when the baby’s neck is stretched and impacted during a complicated birth process. A number of factors, relating to the baby, the health of the mother, and how the child is delivered, influence the risk of experiencing a BPI.

Factors involving the baby
    • Large baby, known as macrosomia (90th percentile in size or larger)
    • Baby being born bottom first, rather than head first (breech presentation)
Factors involving the mother
    • Mother has diabetes, or develops it during pregnancy
    • Mother had a previous vaginal delivery 
Factors involving the delivery
    • Delivery involves use, or misuse, of equipment like forceps and suction tools
    • Baby’s shoulder gets stuck during delivery (shoulder dystocia). Up to 15 percent of shoulder dystocia cases lead to BPI.

Injuries to the nerves in the brachial plexus can cause weakness, loss of feeling, and paralysis in the arms, hands, and shoulders, such as Erb’s palsy and Klumpke’s palsy. Additionally, these complications can lead to children developing different-sized arms and arms with a “waiter’s tip” (arm straight, wrist bent back). In rare cases, BPI can also lead to problems breathing and controlling the diaphragm, as well as Horner’s syndrome, which causes drooping eyelids, smaller pupils, and diminished sweat production in the face.   

Everyone deserves, and is legally entitled, to the proper standard of care, where you get the treatment you need and avoid unnecessary risks. When it comes to preventing BPI, that begins long before birth, and continues well after a BPI occurs.

Before birth

Your care providers should assess factors like the size of the baby versus the mother’s pelvis, plus birth weight, the baby’s position, and whether a scheduled C-section would mean a safer birth. If they anticipate a more complicated or higher-risk delivery, they should make sure they have the proper staff and equipment ready, as well as give providers the proper training to execute a safe birth under these conditions. Failure to do so could constitute malpractice.

During birth

Obstetricians and other maternal health professionals should be ready and trained for complications in the birth process. Oftentimes, that means executing a series of special maneuvers to either reposition the baby, the mother, or both to allow for a smoother delivery. If these maneuvers are done incorrectly, or if equipment such as forceps or vacuums are misused in an attempt to relieve pressure, that is a serious deviation from the proper care you deserve. So is a failure to have the proper obstetricians, orthopedists, pediatricians, and other maternal health experts on hand should complications arise. 

After birth

Thankfully, many BPI injuries recover on their own without surgery in a matter of months, but regular, effective care from neurologists, physical therapists, and others is vital to assure this happens. That can include physical tests of a child’s joints and movement, as well as X-rays, ultrasounds, MRIs, and electrical and nerve conduction tests in the affected areas. To make sure recovery is coming along well, babies often need regular, long-term examinations, as some BPIs take up to 2 years to recover. Additionally, regular physical therapy may be needed to prevent stiffness, atrophy, and dislocation in the joints of a newborn with BPI.

In more serious cases, if these steps don’t work, and healing isn’t coming along after months, surgery may be helpful, which can include nerve grafts and transfers, tendon transfers, and releasing a stuck joint. Much like with the original injury, following a surgery, physical therapy and careful monitoring may be necessary to guarantee a successful recovery. 

Under Minnesota law, you usually have 4 years to bring a malpractice case against your doctor or hospital. 

Malpractice robs a child and their mother of their health and peace of mind, and a medical malpractice suit can help take back some of what you’ve lost. There are no caps on damages in Minnesota, and you are eligible to recover resources which help you meet a number of challenges, including:

  • Medical bills and costs
  • Lost income
  • Past bodily and mental harm, including:
    • Pain
    • Disability
    • Disfigurement
    • Embarrassment
    • Emotional distress
  • Future bodily and mental harm, including:
    • Pain
    • Disability
    • Disfigurement
    • Embarrassment
    • Emotional distress

Minnesota birth injury malpractice lawyers help mothers with BPI complications.

It can be confusing, painful, and time-consuming to sort out what went wrong, but you don’t have to do it alone. If you call us, we may be able to use our network of lawyers and medical experts to review your records and help get you the relief you need, including compensation for medical bills, future treatment, lost income, and pain and suffering. 

You’ve already been let down once, which is why we operate under a contingency fee structure for maximum fairness: we only receive payment if we help you get what you deserve, either a settlement or victory at trial. 

Get in touch with us here if you’re ready to have allies who understand.


We have a process that works in getting exceptional results for our clients. 

We are trial lawyers who prepare every case for trial from Day 1. Investigation and legal research are the first things we do, and we spend a lot of time on them. Because we haven’t filed the case yet, we have complete control – the defendant has no say and we want to use this time wisely.  We interview witnesses that can help us prove the case.  We’ll ask you for all relevant documents in your possession and review those carefully as well.  We also will spend some time conducting legal research about unique issues in the case.  We pull the jury instructions that the judge will ultimately charge the jury with after closing arguments at trial. 

Our next step is typically to send a demand letter to the defendant. In the letter, we thoroughly lay out: the facts surrounding the defendant’s misconduct; the applicable law (including statutory and case citations) that make clear that the defendant broke the law; an analysis of your damages and the defendant’s monetary exposure; a demand for a monetary amount to settle the claim; and an instruction to preserve all relevant evidence, including electronic evidence. The point of this letter is to give the defendant a chance to do the right thing and pay a fair amount before litigation, and to give the defendant an opportunity to present any defenses or evidence it wants us to consider before moving forward.  Sometimes we skip the demand letter if there are strategic reasons to move straight to filing, but we typically give defendants a chance to do the right thing.

If early negotiations fail, great – we file a Complaint and serve the defendant with it. A Complaint is a legal document that states the facts of what happened and alleges how the defendant broke the law. It formally starts the lawsuit.  Many lawyers draft complaints in a general and relatively vague way, just to get it done and filed – because that’s all that’s really required.  We take a different view. We view the Complaint as our first chance to tell your story to the judge, and we take it seriously. So we draft detailed complaints and include legal citations to statutory and judicial authority on unique points.  Sometimes we’ll include a number of exhibits, diagrams, or other demonstrative aids to help the Court understand our claims.  A secondary benefit of this approach is that defense lawyers reading the Complaint can become educated on the problems of their case and the state of the law – sometimes this leads them to reach out to us shortly after service of the Complaint to re-initiate settlement negotiations.  Of course, by that time, the price for settlement has gone up.

Some lawyers view written discovery as a necessary evil – something to get done and out of the way before depositions.  Not us.  Written discovery is a gift and an opportunity.  We spend a great deal of time crafting requests for documents and interrogatories (questions for the defendant to answer in writing) that are specific, detailed, and tailored to get what we need to prove our case.  Many lawyers – even great ones – think written discovery is a waste of time because defense lawyers typically answer them on behalf of their clients and can try to stonewall with legalese and objections.  We view this as a wonderful opportunity.  In our experience, most defense lawyers can’t help themselves when answering discovery: they over-state their defenses and make assertions that their clients will not be able to support in testimony. So we get to commit the defendant to defenses that they can’t back up, leading to contradictions, confusion, and chaos in their depositions later on.  We also use Requests for Admission – which many lawyers don’t.  The Federal Rules and Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure allow us to ask defendants to “admit” certain facts.  We send them RFAs that are very difficult for them to deny.  Of course, they do it anyway, but that sets them up later for cost and fee-shifting, which the Rules mandate for defendants that deny RFAs that are later proven true.  And usually, we can get the defendants’ own witnesses to admit facts that their defense lawyers denied in RFA.  That’s a great situation that leads to more chaos and confusion on the defense side.

One last point on written discovery – we send multiple waves of it throughout discovery.  We typically send 3 or 4 sets of written discovery requests to defendants throughout discovery.  This compounds the problems for them, because the defense lawyers continue to overstate their defenses, but now run into contradictions from not just the defendant witnesses’ deposition testimony, but also their own previous discovery responses.  This makes for a great record that we can present to the judge at dispositive motions, and use for impeachment at trial.

This is our chance to question relevant witnesses, on the record with a court reporter (we typically videotape important depositions as well). We get to confront the defense witnesses with all of the evidence we’ve developed through written discovery and document production. By this time, the defendant put its witnesses in an impossible position through its written defenses, which are often untrue and indefensible.  So the witness has to either lie to support the defense, or admit it’s not true.  That’s a dilemma that works for our clients either way, no matter which option the witness takes.  We use depositions to expose contradictions, create a record for dispositive motions, lock witnesses into their stories so that we can impeach them later at trial, and sometimes, to show defense lawyers how hopeless their case is.  We often calls from defense counsel shortly after depositions of their clients, seeking to re-start settlement negotiations.

The defendant will usually make a motion for summary judgment after discovery, asking the Court to throw out the case without having a jury trial. Because we’ve hit discovery so hard – both through written discovery and depositions – this is a tough motion for defense counsel to write in our cases.  We draft our response for the Court and now get to bring everything together: the admissions, contradictions, nonsense, and obvious fact disputes that we’ve uncovered through discovery.  We tell a compelling story that wraps everything together for the Court and makes clear that the defense motion has to be denied, and the defendant needs to face a jury for its conduct.

Sometimes, we’ll even make an affirmative motion for summary judgment, asking the Court to grant judgment in favor of our client without a trial. These motions are generally rare for plaintiffs to make, because the defendant can usually point to some fact dispute on its intent or some other factor that necessitates a trial. But we make affirmative summary judgment motions significantly more than is typical for plaintiffs, and that’s because the work we put in during discovery helps build a fantastic record to do so.

After the Court denies the defense motion for summary judgment, the defendant has only 2 options: 1) do the right thing and pay you a fair amount to our client to settle your claim (usually much, much more at this point than the defendant could have paid at the beginning of the case to settle); or 2) face a jury for its conduct and risk an enormous verdict. This is the dilemma that we have been creating and forcing the defendant into for the entire case. We’ll engage in settlement negotiations at this point from a position of extreme strength, mainly because most defendants are (rightly) terrified of facing a jury to defend their conduct.

This is, candidly, our favorite part of the case – why we went to law school: to hold the powerful accountable before juries.  We prepare heavily for trial, including: detailed witness preparation, focus groups, and mock trials.  At this point, the potential outcomes and consequences for the defendant are much more severe than if it simply did the right thing at the beginning of the case and paid a fair amount to compensate our client for its misconduct.  As we advocate to the jury for our client, we’re also mindful of protecting the record so that defendants will be unsuccessful in attacking the verdict in post-trial motions or appeal.

What Our Clients Say